ANALISIS ASPEK PEMBUKTIAN DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK PASCA KUHP BARU

Authors

  • HR. NURFAIZ MOHAMAD Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i1.191

Keywords:

Evidence, Defamation, New Criminal Code

Abstract

Protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) on website design or homepage in online business activities is an important aspect that needs to be considered by business people in the digital era. This research aims to analyze the various forms of IPR protection that can be applied to website design, including copyright and trademark. Website designs and the resulting content are automatically protected by copyright in accordance with Law No. 19 of 2002, which is valid for 50 years from publication. Although copyright registration is not required, it provides advantages in terms of legal defense against infringement. In addition, elements such as logos and product names require brand registration to obtain stronger legal protection. The research also identifies the challenges that work owners face in prosecuting IPR infringement in cyberspace, including cost and time. With the increasing use of the internet in business, awareness of the importance of IPR protection has become essential to maintain the authenticity and value of digital assets. The results of this analysis are expected to provide insight for businesses in protecting their works online. The results showed that the Indonesian evidentiary system, which is regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), requires at least two valid pieces of evidence to convict the defendant. This is in accordance with Article 183 of KUHAP, which emphasizes the importance of the validity of evidence in the judicial process. This research also found that the application of the reverse burden of proof in defamation cases is often controversial, as it is considered contrary to the principle of presumption of innocence and human rights

References

Ante, S. (2013). PEMBUKTIAN DAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN DALAM ACARA PIDANA. II(2), 98–104.

Haris, O. K., Abdullah, S. A., Rizky, A., & Indah, S. R. (2024). Penggunaan Digital Forensik dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial Berdasarkan UU ITE. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 6(2), 588–603.

Jekson Kipli Lumban Toruan & Jinner Sidauruk. (2024). Analisis Hak Serta Rehabilitasi Nama Baik Korban Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial. Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 1(4), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i4.630

Lumenta, A. (2020). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK MENURUT KUHP DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG ITE. Lex Crimen, IX(1), 24–31.

Permata Tami, N. D. (2013). STUDI KOMPARASI PENGATURAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK MENURUT HUKUM PIDANA DAN HUKUM PERDATA DI INDONESIA. LAW REFORM, 9(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v9i1.12437

Ponno, J. D. (2023). PENERAPAN DIGITAL FORENSIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DI DUNIA MAYA. Jurnal Fakultas HukumUniversitas Sam Ratulangi Lex Administratum, XIII(1). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/52785/44907

Rohman, R., Muliadi, M., Pratama, F., Saputra, I., Firmansyah, A., Marwan, T., & Irfandi, I. (2024). Sistem Pembuktian dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Tantangan dalam Proses Peradilan. Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.146

Rumondor, A. M. S., Bawole, H. Y. A., & Rompas, D. D. (2024). ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL: PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UNSRAT Lex Privatum, 13(4).

Tanoto, E., Tandy, J., & Banke, R. (2024). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Proses Pembuktian di Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.62017/syariah

Widjaja, G., & Rahayu, F. S. (2024). ANALISIS KASUS PENGHINAAN DAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DI MEDIA SOSIAL : STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 275/PID.SUS/2019/PN.SBY. Jurnal Intelek dan Cendekiawan Nusantara, 1(2), 717–730.

Downloads

Published

01-03-2025

How to Cite

MOHAMAD, H. N. (2025). ANALISIS ASPEK PEMBUKTIAN DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK PASCA KUHP BARU. Ganec Swara, 19(1), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i1.191

Issue

Section

Articles