DISPARITAS HAKIM DALAM MENERAPKAN HUKUMAN BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i1.205Keywords:
Disparity, judge, application of punishment, criminal actAbstract
The aim of this research is to find out the disparity between judges in applying punishment to perpetrators of criminal acts and what are the factors that cause disparity among judges in applying punishment to perpetrators of criminal acts so that they receive sentences that often have different sentences. This research is library research, namely using data in the form of books, laws, articles, journals, several cases that often occur and other literature related to the title, while the technique and data collection is by collecting various ideas, theories and concepts from various sources. literature that focuses on the comparison process between propositions, articles or other laws. The approach methods used in this research are the statutory approach, the conceptual approach and the case approach. The research results show that.
Judges in handing down decisions or disparities in judges in applying sentences to perpetrators of criminal acts often have differences in decisions and punishments because there are no specific guidelines or legal certainty for judges in handing down decisions so that judges often use their own glasses based on various factors and elements that exist in society. And there are also various factors that cause the frequent occurrence of the term disparity between judges in handing down decisions.
References
Andi Kusyandi, Saefullah Yamin. (2023). Disparitas putusan hakim pidana berkualitas yang mencerminkan rasa keadilan dalam system hukum di indonesia. Jurnal yustitia Fakulty of lawa universitas wiralodra. E.ISSN: 2723. 2023.
Arianto. (2020). disparitas hakim dalam perkara tindak pidana. Jurnal ilmiah bidang hukum pidana, Vol. 4(4) November 2020 pp. 654-662. Faklutas hukum universitas syah kuala.
Hanna Putri Aulia, 2022.
I Putu Bayu Pinarta and I Ketut Mertha. (n.d). “Pengaturan tindak pidana korupsi: Analisis disparitas penaggulangan penjatuhan pidana di indonesia” n.d. 1-10.
https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/3264/3/BAB%20II.pdf
Lawrence M. Friedman. (2019). Sistem Hukum: Perspektif Ilmu Sosial Terjemahan M. K. Hozim Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media, 2019).
Marwah Mas. (2005). Konfigurasi Penjatuhan Pidana. Jakarta, Bhineka Tunggal
M.Alvicki Munthe. (2020). Disparitas putusan hakim terhadap tindak pidana penadahan kendaraan sepeda bermotor. Studi Putusan No 447/Pid.B/2020/Pn Bna dan No 26/Pid.B/2021/Pn Bna.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana.PT Alumni. Bandung 2010.
Nimerodi Gulo, Ade Kurniawan M. (2018). Disparitas Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Jilid 47 No.3, Juli 2018, Halaman 215-227. p-ISSN: 2086-2695, e-ISSN: 2527-4716.
Nur fadilah al-idrus. (2023). Disparitas putusan pemidanaan perkara penipuan online. Jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id. E-ISSN: 2579-4868; P-ISSN: 1978-6506. Vol. 16. No. 3 Desember 2023).
Nadya Walyyatun Nisa, Ummi Rahmatinnur. (2020). Muhammadiyah Law Review: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Vol 4, No. 2 Tahun 2020.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana, 2008).
Yusmadi. (2024). STIS Al-Hilal Sigli, Aceh, Faktor terjadinya disparitas terhadap penjatuhan sanksi pidana. Jurnal Tahqiqa, Vol. 18, No. 1, Tahun 2024 P-ISSN: 1978-4945 E-ISSN: 2828-4372.
Zuhrah, Adi Sulistiyono, Ridwan, Syamsuddin. (2024). Iksan Independensi Hakim dalam Berbagai Disparitas Putusan Perkara Korupsi di Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Fundamental Vol. 13 No. 1. Januari-Juni 2024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 TITIN APRIANI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
