ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PENAGIHAN UTANG OLEH DEBT COLLECTOR BERDASARKAN (PJOK) NO 18/PJOK.01/2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i1.208Keywords:
Debt Collectors, Debtor Rights, Consumer ProtectionAbstract
This research aims to analyze the juridical aspects related to debt collection by debt collectors based on the Debt Collection Services Regulation (PJOK) No.18/PJOK.01/2018. The main focus of this research is to identify the legal position of debt collectors in the collection process as well as the legal consequences of debt arising from these collection actions. The method used in this research is a normative approach with qualitative analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources.The results show that debt collectors act as collection agents who act under the authority of the creditor, but do not have permission to carry out forced execution without a court decision. Forced towing of motor vehicles by debt collectors can be considered an unlawful act if it does not follow established procedures, which can result in criminal liability for debt collectors in accordance with the provisions in the Criminal Code (KUHP).This study recommends the need for clearer and stricter regulations regarding debt collection practices by debt collectors to protect the rights of debtors and ensure that the collection process is carried out ethically and in accordance with applicable laws. Thus, it is hoped that a balance can be created between the interests of creditors and consumer protection in debt collection practices in Indonesia.
References
Amalia R, R., & Sulistyanta. (2020). TINDAK PIDANA PERAMPASAN KENDARAAN BEMOTOR OLEH DEBT COLLECTOR DALAM PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA. Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 9(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v9i2.47398
Ekawati, D., Prayitno, I. H., & Hadi, A. (2023). Analisa Kewenangan Debt Collector dalam Penagihan Hutang Menurut Putusan MA Nomor 356 K/Pdt/207. Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v6i1.33819
I Nyoman Suwardika, I Nyoman Suandika, & Ida Bagus Anggapurana Pidada. (2023). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Tugas dan Fungsi Debt Collector Pasca Putusan MK. Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 1(4), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.683
LAMIA KARIMAH NASR. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Pelindungan Hukum Nasabah Bank dalam Proses Penagihan Kredit (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3192 K/Pdt/2012). Gadja Mada.
Nafiatul Munawaroh. (2023). Etika Penagihan Utang oleh Debt Collector. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/etika-penagihan-utang-oleh-idebt-collector-i-cl5802/
Putu Gandiyasa Wijartama & Ibrahim R. (2016). CARA-CARA PENAGIHAN UTANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA. Jurnal Harian Regional, 4(2), 1–16.
Refky Anwar, Sri Lestari Poernomo, & Dian Eka Pusvita Azis. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Cara-Cara Penagihan Utang Di Pegadaian. Quwanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 1–11.
Sushanty, V. R. (2020). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP DEBT COLLECTOR DAN LEASING PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Gorontalo Law Review, 3(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v3i1.896
Wico, S., Natalia, F., & Bunalven, S. N. (2022). EFEKTIVITAS OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (OJK) DALAM MENGAWASI PERMASALAHAN PRAKTIK PINJAMAN ONLINE ILEGAL DI INDONESIA. Lex Jurnalica, 19(1), 9–22.
Willa Wahyuni. (2023). Tidak Sembarangan, Ini Aturan OJK Soal Penagihan Pinjol Lewat Debt Collector. Hukum Online.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 PUTRI REGINA S. PAKAYA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
