ANALISIS YURIDIS PERBANDINGAN JUDICIAL PARDON DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 1 TAHUN 1946 TENTANG PERATURAN TENTANG HUKUM PIDANA DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 1 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i1.238Keywords:
Comparison, Judicial Pardon, Old Criminal Code, New Criminal CodeAbstract
With the enactment of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code or the New Criminal Code, it has amended Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 concerning the Criminal Code. There have been several additions and updates to criminal law in Indonesia, especially regarding the formulation of the concept of Judicial Pardon. This study aims to determine the existence and significance of the concept of Judicial Pardon in the New Criminal Code and to determine the implications of its formulation. This type of research is normative research, which uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach, a comparative approach and a historical approach. The results of this study discuss the existence and significance of Judicial Pardon contained in Article 54 paragraph (2) of the New Criminal Code. The Old Criminal Code did not recognize Judicial Pardon and upheld the principle of legality where legal certainty is the strongest pillar, therefore judges have no other legal options in deciding cases. The formulation of the principle of Judicial Pardon in the New Criminal Code in its implementation in the future is very good, because it provides broad benefits to the perpetrators and to the community as well. However, the formulation of the New Criminal Code does not provide definite limitations or criteria related to the requirements of Judicial Pardon which can later lead to multiple interpretations among judges in implementing the concept
References
Abdul Manan, (2006), Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia, Cetakan ke satu, Kencana, Jakarta.
Ali, Mahrus, (2015), Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Dewi, Putu Mery Lusyana & I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi, (2020), “Kebijakan Formulasi Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) Dalam Rkuhp”, dalam Jurnal Kertha Wicara Volume 9 No. IX, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, Bali.
Fatoni, Syamsul (2016), Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan, Setara Press, Malang.
Islamy, Fikri Ariyad & Athoillah, (2022), “Pemaafan Hakim Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia : Pespektif Falsafah Pancasila”, dalam Jurnal Hunila, Volume 1, No. 1, Universitas Selamat Sri, Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan.
Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (RKUHAP)
Sakidjo, Aruan & Bambang Poernomo, (1990), Hukum Pidana: Dasar aturan umum hukum pidana kodifikasi, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Soedirjo, (1985), Jaksa dan Hakim Dalam Proses Pidana, CV Akademika Pressindo, Jakarta.
Tahun 2014.
Ujan, Andre Ata, (2009), Filsafat Hukum, Kanasius, Yogyakarta.
Undang- Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Tentang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang -Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP 2023).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Zaidan, M.Ali, (2016), Kebijakan Kriminal, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta Timur.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JAUHARI D. KUSUMA, B. FARHANA KURNIA LESTARI, JUNI PUSPITA DEWI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
