EFEKTIVITAS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS "BIMA NTANDA RAWO" PASCA PENDAFTARAN STUDI TENTANG DAMPAK EKONOMI DAN TANTANGAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM
The Effectiveness Of Legal Protection For The Geographical Indication “Bima Ntanda Rawo” Post-Registration A Study On The Economic Impact And Law Enforcement Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i4.437Keywords:
Geographical Indication, Bima Ntanda Rawo, Legal Protection, Effectivenes, Law EnforcementAbstract
This research is motivated by the urgency of legal protection for Geographical Indications (GI) regarding the “Bima Ntanda Rawo” woven fabric as an intangible cultural heritage and a source of economic welfare for the community in Bima. The main objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of GI legal protection after registration, focusing on its economic impact on artisans and the challenges faced in enforcement. The research method employs a normative-sociological approach, combining doctrinal and legal norms analysis (Law No. 20/2016, Ministerial Regulations, and TRIPs) with empirical data from interviews and field observations with weaving artisans. The results show that GI legal protection has increased sale prices, added value, and product image, although its implementation still faces administrative, financial, and legal socialization obstacles. Legal enforcement of GIs also faces issues regarding proof of violations and weak legal literacy among artisan communities. These findings enhance understanding of community-based legal effectiveness and imply the need for institutional strengthening, a simple reporting system, and technological integration for GI supervision. The study’s limitation lies in the empirical data scope, which does not yet cover cross-regional cases, and the optimization of digital analysis for GI product surveillance
References
Agoes, I. G. R. (2020). Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia: Suatu Pengantar. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Aryani, F., Evangelista, B., & Mutiah, H. (2025). Perlindungan hukum indikasi geografis dalam UU No. 20 Tahun 2016: Analisis mekanisme pendaftaran kain tenun Bima. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(3), 843–857.
Astuti, K. Y., & Pratiwi, S. R. (2021). Perlindungan indikasi geografis dalam kerangka hukum nasional dan internasional: Studi komparatif tenun tradisional. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(4), 475–492.
Friedman, L. M. (2021). The legal system: A social science perspective (Edisi ke-2). Russell Sage Foundation.
Gangjee, D. S. (2020). Sui generis or independent geographical indications protection: What is the future of geographical indications in Southeast Asia? The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23(1-2), 68–87.
Hidayat, A. S., Pratiwi, R., & Suryanto, E. (2023). Pascasertifikasi indikasi geografis: Tantangan penjaminan mutu dan sistem pengawasan kopi arabika Kintamani. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 11(1), 75–90.
Irnawati, A., & Akmal, F. (2022). Analisis sosial-ekonomi pengrajin tenun di daerah Bima pasca pendaftaran indikasi geografis. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebudayaan Daerah, 7(2), 33–48.
Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 tentang Tata Cara Permohonan, Pemeriksaan, dan Pemberian Indikasi Geografis. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 524.
Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 tentang Tata Cara Permohonan, Pemeriksaan, dan Pemberian Indikasi Geografis. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 187.
Lubis, M. A., & Dalimunthe, S. F. (2022). Analisis efektivitas pengelolaan indikasi geografis kopi Gayo pasca sertifikasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia (HARKAT), 16 (2), 112–125.
Purnamawati, I. G. A. (2016). Perlindungan hukum indikasi geografis terhadap kerajinan tradisional untuk penguatan ekonomi wilayah. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 11 (1), 31–46.
Ratée, C. (2022). Legal framework and implementation of geographical indication protection in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 3(2), 121–137.
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 252.
Setiawan, F. (2020). Kekuatan indikasi geografis sebagai pelindung produk lokal. Jurnal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, 12(2), 97–112.
Soekanto, S. (2020). Efektivitas hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Van Caenegem, W., & Cleary, J. A. (2021). The emperor's new clothes?: Why geographical indications may not be the development panacea for rural communities. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 24 (3-4), 179–199.
World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights.
Yuliandri. (2022). Indikasi geografis sebagai kekayaan intelektual komunal: Konsep dan tantangan pengembangannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 29(2), 265-285.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Feni Aryani, Hanifah Muthiah, Nur Khusnul Hamidah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
