MODEL PENGAWASAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN PUTUSAN YANG BERKEADILAN
Model of Constitutional Judge Supervision in Realizing Justice Oriented Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i4.473Keywords:
Model, Oversight, Constitutional Judges, Decision, JusticeAbstract
Judicial oversight of the Indonesian Constitutional Court (MK) has faced major challenges since Constitutional Court Decision No. 005/PUU-IV/2006, which annulled the Judicial Commission’s (KY) authority to supervise constitutional judges. Since then, oversight has been conducted only internally through the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court (MKMK), which has proven ineffective due to potential conflicts of interest and limited constitutional legitimacy. This research adopts a normative legal method with three approaches: statute, conceptual, and comparative. The findings reveal that the current oversight system cannot ensure both judicial independence and accountability. Therefore, reconstructing the model is crucial, with three possible options: (1) restoring limited supervisory authority to KY, (2) institutionalizing MKMK as a permanent independent body with a strong legal basis, or (3) establishing a new external supervisory institution specifically for constitutional judges. Such reconstruction is vital to safeguard the integrity of MK’s decisions and strengthen public trust in constitutional justice.
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Corder, H. (2014). Judicial authority in a changing South Africa. In H. W. Micklitz & B. De Witte (Eds.), The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the Member States. Cambridge: Intersentia.
Honeste Vivere. (2023). Rekonstruksi Sistem Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi: Antara Independensi dan Akuntabilitas. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 12(3).
Kim, C. Y. (2011). The Constitutional Court of Korea and Judicialization of Politics. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
Kommers, D. P., & Miller, R. A. (2012). The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (3rd ed.). Durham: Duke University Press.
Lailam, T. (2022). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Federal Jerman Dalam Perlindungan Hak Fundamental Warga Negara Berdasarkan Kewenangan Pengaduan Konstitusional. Jurnal HAM, 13(1),
Mahkamah Konstitusi, Buku II Laporan Pelaksanaan Putusan MPR oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi 2003-2004; Satu Tahun Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengawal Konstitusi Indonesia, MKRI, Jakarta, 2004.
Maruarar Siahaan, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesa, Jakarta, 2006.
Michaela Hailbronner, “Rethinking the Rise of the German Constitutional Court: From Anti-Nazism to Value Formalism,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 3 (2014):
Muhtadi, “Politik Hukum Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi”, Fiat Justisia Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 8, No, 1, Januari-Maret 2014.
Ni’matul Huda dan Riri Nazriyah, Teori dan Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Yogyakarta: Nusamedia, 2011.
Nurfitra, E. (2021). “Grey Area Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi Pasca Putusan MK No. 005/PUU-IV/2006.” Jurnal Yudisial, 14(2).
Ramadan, A. (2022). “Efektivitas Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Mekanisme Pengawasan Hakim.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(3).
Rasji. (2021). Problematika Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi Pasca Putusan MK No. 005/PUU-IV/2006. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(3).
Rizal, M. (2023). “Penguatan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(1).
Wiryanto, Etik Hakim Konstitusi: Rekonstruksi dan Evolusi Sistem Pengawasan. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khairul Umam, Ashari Ashari, Muh. Alfian Fallahiyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
