DILEMA KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT: ANALISIS JAMINAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DALAM UU ITE DI ERA DIGITAL
Dilemma Of Freedom Of Expression: Analysis Of Legal Protection Guarantees In The ITE Law In The Digital Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v20i2.671Keywords:
Freedom of Expression, ITE Law, Digital Era, Legal ProtectionAbstract
The development of the digital era has brought a major transformation for the fulfillment of human rights, particularly the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Freedom of opinion is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Indonesian Constitution. However, in the digital era, the implementation of this right often clashes with technical regulations, especially the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law). The implementation of the ITE Law often triggers dilemmas and controversies in society due to articles that are considered open to multiple interpretations and vulnerable to being misused to criminalize legitimate criticism. This article aims to analyze how a balance between public order and human rights can be achieved within the framework of cyber law in Indonesia today. The research methodology used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach. Research results indicate that although the ITE Law was designed to create order in the digital space, several vague articles such as defamation and hate speech often create a chilling effect that hinders healthy public participation. Although the second revision of the ITE Law (Law 1/2024) has attempted to provide clearer boundaries, the challenges of fair law enforcement and the protection of human rights remain central issues in Indonesia's digital democracy
References
Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. (2019). Hukum Transaksi Elektronik di Indonesia. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Indonesian Center for Digital Rights (SAFENet). (2023). Laporan Tahunan Kebebasan Ekspresi di Indonesia.
Irawati, S. A. (2024). Perbedaan Sengaja dan Tidak Sengaja dalam Hukum Pidana. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 10(4), 1137-1146.
Jalal, Abdul, and Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. (2018). Keterlibatan Pejabat Notaris Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Turut Serta Melakukan Tindak Kejahatan Dalam Pemalsuan Dokumen." Jurnal akta 5, no. 1 (2018): 324708.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Nasution, F., Sulistiani, L., & Putri, N. S. (2025). Praktik Penahanan Tersangka Dalam Kasus yang Diancam Pidana Dibawah 5 Tahun oleh UU ITE Dikaitkan Dengan Alasan Penahanan Berdasarkan KUHAP. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(4).
Riyadi, Eko. (2018). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia: Perspektif Internasional, Regional, dan Nasional. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
Rizal, M., Permana, N., & Qalbia, F. (2024). Transformasi Sistem Perpajakan Di Era Digital: Tantangan, Inovasi, Dan Kebijakan Adaptif. Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 4(4), 340-348.
Silalahi, W., & Mutiara, A. N. (2025). Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Pasal Pencemaran Nama Baik dalam UU ITE: Antara Perlindungan Reputasi dan Kebebasan Berekspresi di Era Digital. Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(3), 827-839.
Suhaimi, A., & Ambodo, T. (2020). Kejahatan Terhadap Ketertiban Umum. Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, 5(2), 1-10.
Syatta, I. M., Maziyyah, R., Al Musyaawi, M. I. S., & Bagus, M. (2023). Urgensi Kontrol Buzzer sebagai Langkah Stabilitas Politik Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2024. Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum, 4(6), 608-626.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ida Ayu Sintya Naraswari Manuaba, I Gusti Agus Yuda Trisna Pramana, Ni Putu Candra Gunasari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











