DISHARMONI KEBIJAKAN KRIMINAL: KONTRADIKSI PENGATURAN DELIK ZINA, INFANTISIDA, DAN PEMBUNUHAN KELUARGA DALAM KUHP BARU

Disharmony of Criminal Policy: Contradictions in the Regulation of Adultery, Infanticide, and Familial Homicide under the New Indonesian Penal Code

Authors

  • Yuni Ristanti Universitas Mataram
  • Febrihadi Suparidho Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v20i2.700

Keywords:

Infanticide, criminal policy, proportionality in sentencing, National Criminal Code, adultery offences

Abstract

The regulation of infanticide under the Indonesian National Criminal Code raises issues concerning sentencing consistency when compared to the expansion of adultery offences and the aggravated punishment for homicide within the family sphere. This study aims to analyze the regulation of Article 460 of the National Criminal Code through the doctrines of criminal policy and the theory of proportionality in sentencing. The research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, case, and historical approaches. The conceptual approach is utilized to construct the concept of infanticide through the doctrine of criminal policy and the theory of proportionality in sentencing, while the case approach examines several judicial decisions concerning infanticide. Legal materials were analyzed qualitatively using proportionality parameters in sentencing. The findings indicate that the regulation of infanticide in the National Criminal Code does not fully reflect a balance between the seriousness of the offence, the offender’s culpability, and victim protection. Furthermore, the phrase “fear of being discovered by others” creates juridical ambiguity because it is not expressly formulated as either a justification or an excuse. Therefore, reformulation of Article 460 of the National Criminal Code is necessary to ensure conformity with the principle of proportionality in sentencing and the protection of children’s right to life

References

Abintoro Prakoso. (2023). Politik Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pustaka.

Arief, B. N. (2014). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru (Edisi ke-2). Jakarta: PRENADAMEDIA GROUP.

Basiran, Y. R., Syarif, N. M., & Rahman, N. S. (2025). Infantisida: Kajian Literatur Tentang Pemeriksaan Forensik Bayi Baru Lahir pada Kasus Infatisida di Indonesia. Jurnal Kesehatan Unggul Gemilang, 9(10).

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 12/Pid.Sus Anak/ 2028/ PT TJK. , (2018).

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 36/ Pid.B/2024/ PN Kfm. , (2024).

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 211/Pid.Sus/2025/ PN Jmr. , (2025).

du Bois-Pedain. (2023). Hirsch, Andreas (Andrew) von. In M. Sellers & S. Kirste (Eds.). In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Retrieved from Springer. doi.org

Fazira, N. N., Wibowo, I. H., Aulia, M. F., Turnip, S., & Arifin, M. (2025). Alasan Pemaaf Dan Pembenar. Jurnal Sahabat, II, 17–22.

Fuadi Isnawan. (2018). Analisa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Bayi (Infantisida) di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Sleman. Jurnal Yuridis, 5(1), 23–42.

Guntur Pambudi Wijaya. (2025). Legalitas Formal VS Living Law: Penerapan Pasal 411 KUHP Nasional terhadap Perkawinan Tidak Dicatatkan. Dandapala. Retrieved from https://www.dandapala.com/opini/detail/legalitas-formal-vs-living-law-penerapan-pasal-411-kuhp-nasional-terhadap-perkawinan-tidak-dicatatkan

H. Ishaq. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Penelitian Skripis, Tesis, serta Disertasi) (cetakan 1). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Hanapi, A., & Fitri, S. (2024). Perspektif Masyarakat Terhadap Pernikahan Anak Sebagai Pencegahan Terjadinya Zina. FATHIR: Jurnal Studi Islam, 1(3), 268–281.

Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nomor 1 tahun 2023. , (2023). Indonesia.

Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Surabaya: Prenadamedia Grup.

Nasional, B. P. H., & Indonesia, K. H. dan H. A. M. R. (2015). Draft Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Indonesia.

Nasruddin, S. (2024). Tindak Pidana Zina Menurut UU No 1 Tahun 1946 , UU No 1 Tahun 2023 ( KUHP ) Dan Hukum Islam. Journal Of Law and Nation, 3(1), 1–13.

Nindy N. Bowonsili. (2015). Penerapan Sanksi Terhadap Ibu Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Anak. Lex Crimen, IV(7), 43–50.

Permana, F. H., Soponyono, E., & Sularto, R. B. (2016). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Makar di indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(4), 1–11.

satochid Kartanegara. (n.d.). Hukum Pidana (bagian II). Balai Lektur Mahasiswa.

Setiawan, D., Juna, A. M., & Fadillah, M. S. (2024). Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Penerapan Hukuman Pidana di Indonesia. JIMMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(3), 266–278.

Soedjono Soekanto. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum (cetakan 3). Jakarta: UI-Press.

William W. Berry III. (2011). Promulgating Proportionality. Georgia Law Review, 46(1), article 4. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/glr/vol46/iss1/4

Downloads

Published

07-06-2026

How to Cite

Ristanti, Y., & Suparidho, F. (2026). DISHARMONI KEBIJAKAN KRIMINAL: KONTRADIKSI PENGATURAN DELIK ZINA, INFANTISIDA, DAN PEMBUNUHAN KELUARGA DALAM KUHP BARU: Disharmony of Criminal Policy: Contradictions in the Regulation of Adultery, Infanticide, and Familial Homicide under the New Indonesian Penal Code. Ganec Swara, 20(2), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v20i2.700

Issue

Section

Articles