ANALISIS PUTUSAN PN MATARAM No. 8/Pdt.G.S/2024 TENTANG EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA DAN ISU LOSS OF USE PASKA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Analysis f The Mataram PN Decision No.8/Pdt.G.S/2024 On The Execution Of Fiduciary Guarantees And The Issue Of Loss Of Use After The Constitutional Court Decision

Authors

  • Muhammad Chairul Azizy Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59896/pesolah.v2i1.528

Keywords:

Fiduciary Security Execution, Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, Unilateral Execution, Damages; Loss of Use, Debtor Protection, Mataram District Court Decision, Normative Juridical Method

Abstract

This study examines Decision No. 8/Pdt.G.S/2024 of the Mataram District Court concerning the execution of fiduciary security following Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. It focuses on the prohibition of unilateral execution by creditors and the legal reasoning behind the rejection of the debtor’s claims for material, immaterial, and loss-of-use damages. Using a normative juridical methodology, the study finds that the judges consistently applied the Constitutional Court’s interpretation, declaring the unilateral repossession of the vehicle without a court order as an unlawful act. However, the rejection of all compensation claims reflects insufficient protection for the debtor’s actual losses, particularly loss of use. The decision also highlights a normative gap regarding proof of non-economic damages in fiduciary execution cases. Therefore, more operational judicial guidelines are needed to ensure that civil judgments provide not only formal justice but also substantive justice for debtors.

References

Admiral. (2018). Aspek hukum kontrak leasing dan kontrak financing. 2018, 2, 397–403.

Herlina. (2020). Implikasi putusan mahkamah konstitusi terhadap eksekusi jaminan fidusia [skripsi]. Universitas islam negeri sunan kalijaga yogyakarta.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2019). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia

Oktaviani, n. G. (2024). Implementation of the agreement with fiduciary guarantee in jambi city.

PN Mataram. (2024). Putusan PN Mataram No. 8/Pdt.G.S/2024 Tentang Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dan Isu Loss Of Use Paska Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Siti mahmudah, s. M. (2025). Penerapan jaminan fidusia dalam leasing kendaraan bermotor: analisis terhadap penyalagunaan dan perlindungan konsumen. Https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15349280

Sudana, i. M. (2016). Alternatif pembiayaan barang modal dengan leasing. 13(4).

Suryono, k. E. (2021). Eksekusi sepihak oleh perusahaan leasing menggunakan debt collector terhadap obyek jaminan fidusia. Widya pranata hukum : jurnal kajian dan penelitian hukum, 2(2), 1–17. Https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v2i2.264

Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia

Downloads

Published

04-03-2026

How to Cite

Azizy, M. C. (2026). ANALISIS PUTUSAN PN MATARAM No. 8/Pdt.G.S/2024 TENTANG EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA DAN ISU LOSS OF USE PASKA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: Analysis f The Mataram PN Decision No.8/Pdt.G.S/2024 On The Execution Of Fiduciary Guarantees And The Issue Of Loss Of Use After The Constitutional Court Decision. PESOLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.59896/pesolah.v2i1.528

Issue

Section

Articles