PENERAPAN ASAS DOMINUS LITIS DALAM HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA

Application Of The Dominus Litis Principle In Indonesian Positive Law

Authors

  • Lalu Panca Tresna D. Fakultas Hukum, Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Mataram
  • Muhammad Rifaldi Setiawan Fakultas Hukum, Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i2.271

Keywords:

Dominus Litis, Law, Criminal Justice System

Abstract

Prosecutors are central figures in the administration of criminal justice because they have the authority to determine cases (dominus litis) to be forwarded to the courts. However, in fact, the application of the Dominus Litis principle is not optimal, such as the implementation of horizontal supervision and the termination of cases. examines the application of the principle of dominus litis to positit law in Indonesia. Normative legal research with the Approach of the Act; futuristic and comparative. The application of the Dominus litis Principle in the Criminal Procedure Code is contained in Article 1 Number (6) letters a and b; 139, as the principle of functional differentiation in Articles 14 and 137, based on the position and function of the prosecutor in the criminal justice system is regulated in Article 140 paragraph (2); Law No. 11 of 2021 Amendment to Law No. 16 of 2004 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 55/PUU-XI/2013 and No. 29/PUU-XIV/2016. Draft Criminal Procedure Law (RUU-KUHAP) Article 8 paragraph (1); 12 Subsection (8); 42 Subsections (1) Letters (b) and 46 Subsections (3) and (4). Prosecutors in Indonesia are in the Executive Institution, have several principles, do not have investigative authority; the scope of criminal, civil and administrative prosecutions of the State and not being double nature of the prosecutors and the macau in the Judiciary, focused on the principle of legality, has the authority to investigate, prosecute criminal and civil prosecutors and is double nature of the prosecutors

References

Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2002). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Konsep KUHP Baru, Cetakan Ke-1. Jakrta: Kencana Prenadamedia Grub.

Djunaedi. (2013). “Tinjauan Yuridis Tugas Dan Kewenangan Jaksa Demi Tercapainya Nilai-Nilai Keadilan.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Volume I.

Effendy, Marwan. (2005). Kejaksaan RI: Posisi Dan Fungsinya Dari Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hamzah, Andi. (2001). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Yahya. (2000). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP (Edisi Kedua) Seri: Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hartanti, Evi. (2009). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Lebang, Moh. Andika Surya dan Rendi Kastra. (2021). “Perbandingan Antara Peran Jaksa Di Indonesia Dengan Peran Jaksa Di Daearah Administrasi Khusus Macao Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan Vol. 9 No.3

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mathovani, Reda. (2025). “Penerapan Asas Dominus Litis Dalam Undang-Undang KPK.” Hukum Online. Retrieved April 27. (https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/penerapan-asas-dominis-litis-dalam-uu-kpk-lt5ddf8ba3bb064).

Oesman, Oetojo dan Alfian. (1991). Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Dalam Berbagai Bidang Lehidupan Bermasyarakat, Berbangsa Dan Bernegara. Jakarta: BP 7 Pusat.

Pangribuan, Luhut. (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana: Surat Resmi Advokat Di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Papasa sinar Sinanti.

RM, Surachman dan Andi Hamzah. (1996). Jaksa Di Berbagai Negara Peranan Dan Kedudukannya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Santika, Gita. (2021). “Peran Kejaksaan Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Kejahatan.” Progresif XVI.

Supriyanta. (2009). “KUHAP Dan SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA TERPADU.” Jurnal Wacana Hukum VIII No. 1.

Widhayanti, Erni. 1996. Hak-Hak Tersangka/Terdakwa Di Dalam KUHAP. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Zikry, Ichsan, dkk. (2016). “Prapenututan Sekarang, Ratusan Ribu Perkara Disimpan, Ratusan Ribu Perkara Hilang : Penelitian Pelaksanaan Mekanisme Prapenuntutan Di Indonesia Tahun 2012-2014,.” LBH Jakarta & MaPPI FHUI.

Downloads

Published

01-06-2025

How to Cite

Tresna D., L. P., & Setiawan, M. R. (2025). PENERAPAN ASAS DOMINUS LITIS DALAM HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA: Application Of The Dominus Litis Principle In Indonesian Positive Law. Ganec Swara, 19(2), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i2.271

Issue

Section

Articles