PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI OLEH KPK: SEBUAH PENELUSURAN TEORETIS
Termination of Investigation and Prosecution of Corruption Crimes by The KPK: A Theoretical Exploration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i2.272Keywords:
Corruption, Termination, Investigation, ProsecutionAbstract
The termination of investigation and prosecution of corruption crimes is one of the important substances of the amendment to Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. The emergence of this mechanism in the KPK's authority triggered discourse in the academic realm and legal practice. Naturally, because this mechanism was previously one of the special elements owned by the KPK that excluded the provisions of the codification of criminal procedure law (KUHAP). This article takes a place as a supporter with the basis of argumentation on the theoretical aspects and urgency of the mechanism for terminating investigations and prosecutions by the KPK. This paper uses a normative legal research method that entirely uses legal materials obtained through literature studies. The results show that the termination of investigation and prosecution of corruption crimes is based on the sunrise principle and sunset principle as well as the shield function and the sword function as well as the principle of realistic prospect of conviction which in its implementation has two filters, namely evidential sufficiency and public interest. From a theoretical perspective, the termination of investigation and prosecution can be traced from the integrative theory. This theory is described as a basis that provides balance in criminal procedure law and is sourced from customary law and the way of life of Indonesian society. In terms of urgency, the authority to terminate investigations and prosecutions provides additional alternatives for the KPK in handling corruption crimes, especially in realizing legal certainty and the principle of speedy trial in criminal procedure law.
References
Al-Fitra. (2014). Hapusnya Hak Menuntut dan Menjalankan Pidana. Raih Asa Sukses.
Badan Legislatif Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. (2019). Naskah Akademis RUU Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. 3, 1–63.
Ballin, M. F. H. H. (2012). Anticipative Criminal Investigation, Theory and Counterterrorism Practice in Netherlands and United States,. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. T.M.C. ASSER PRESS.
Davies, M., And, H. C., & Tyrer, J. (2005). Criminal Justice An Introduction to the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales (third). Perason Longman.
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. (2019). Risalah Rapat Dengar Pendapat Umum Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Easter, L., & Yuntho, E. (2016). Pengujian Oleh Publik (Public Review) Terhadap Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Ervita, M. (2019). Penghentian Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Penyidik Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Sebagai Objek Praperadilan (Studi terhadap Putusan Nomor: 24/PID/2018/PN.JKT/SEL.). Universitas Indonesia.
Fuady, M. (2018). Metode Riset Hukum Pendekatan Teori dan Konsep (1st ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Harahap, Y. (2009). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Sinar Grafika.
Hasil Wawancara. (2022a). Penyidik KPK Agus Ari Wibowo 17 Februari 2022.
Hasil Wawancara. (2022b). Prof. Andi Hamzah 26 Januari 2022.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2015, April 10). Hal Ihwal Praperadilan. Beniharmoniharefa.Blogspot. http://beniharmoniharefa.blogspot.com/2015/04/hal-ihwal-praperadilan.html
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2021). Asas Lex Specialis Systematis dan Hukum Pidana Pajak. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.v21.1-12
Loqman, L. (1990). Pra-Peradilan Di Indonesia. Ghalia Indoensia.
Luhut M.P. Pangaribuan. (2016). Hukum Pidana Khusus (Tindak Pidana Ekonomi, Pencucian Uang, Korupsi dan Kerjasama Internasional Serta Pengembalian Aset). Pustaka Kemang.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2010). Putusan Nomor 60/PUU-VIII/2010. Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2021). Putusan Nomor 70/PUU-XVII/2019 (pp. 1–352).
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2003). Putusan MK No. 006/PUU-I/2003. 3.
Poernomo, B. (1993). Pola Dasar Teori-Asas Umum Hukum Acara Pidana dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Liberty.
Rachman, D. A. (2019). 18 Kasus Korupsi Besar Mangkrak, Pimpinan KPK Tegaskan Terus Bekerja. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/05/15/13015381/18-kasus-korupsi-besar-mangkrak-pimpinan-kpk-tegaskan-terus-bekerja?page=all
Rachman, T. (2010). Dasar Teori Kewenangan Penyidik Maupun Penuntut Umum Dalam Menghentikan Perkara Pidana. Yuridika, 25(3), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v25i3.255
Ramadhan, C. R. (2016). Pengantar Analisis Ekonomi Dalam Kebijakan Pidana di Indonesia (S. W. Eddyono (ed.)). Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR) - MaPPI FHUI – Aliansi Nasional Reformasi KUHP.
Republik Indonesia. (1981). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (pp. 1–108).
Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Nomor. 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor. 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (pp. 1–32).
rm.id. (2021, September 3). Kebanyakan Kasus Mangkrak Alasan KPK Baru Tahan Tersangka Korupsi Jasa Tirta II. Rm.Id.
Suwiknyo, E. (2021). Lika-liku Korupsi Eks Dirut Pelindo II RJ Lino, Kini Divonis 4 Tahun Bui. Kabar24. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20211215/16/1477760/lika-liku-korupsi-eks-dirut-pelindo-ii-rj-lino-kini-divonis-4-tahun-bui
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahwan Ahwan, Yuni Ristanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
