IMPLEMENTASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 69/PPU-XIII/2015 DALAM PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN
Implementation of The Constitutional Court Ruling No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 in Marriage Agreements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i2.285Keywords:
Marital Property, Constitutional Court, Marriage AgreementAbstract
The implementation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 concerning prenuptial and postnuptial agreements in Indonesia. Prior to this ruling, marriage agreements could only be made before the marriage took place, as stipulated in Article 29 of Law No. 1 of 1974 and Article 139 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The Constitutional Court's decision marked a legal breakthrough by allowing married couples to enter into a marriage agreement after the wedding, provided it does not violate legal principles or public order. This research employs a normative juridical method with a conceptual approach, analyzing the legal concepts of marriage agreements, the principle of freedom of contract, and the position of the Constitutional Court’s ruling within the national legal system. The findings indicate that the decision reinforces the principles of justice and equality in marital relationships and grants couples greater flexibility in managing their assets according to their needs. However, its implementation faces several challenges, such as limited public understanding and the absence of detailed technical regulations to support its enforcement. Therefore, harmonization of regulations and increased public awareness are necessary to ensure the effective application of this Constitutional Court decision
References
Eva Dwinopianti. 2017. “Implikasi Dan Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/Puu-Xiii/2015 Terhadap Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan Setelah Kawin Yang Dibuat Di Hadapan Notaris.” Lex Renaissance vol 2 (January):16–34.
Fransisca, Ingrid, Matina Candra, and Zil Aidi. 2024. “Implikasi Atas Berlakunya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII-2015 Terhadap Perjanjian Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” Unes Law Review 6 (3): 8849–59. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.
Hendra Pranata Dharmaputra, Made P, Kejaksaan Negeri Nusa Penida, and Dewa Gde Rudy. 2021. “AKIBAT HUKUM PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN TERHADAP HAK ATAS TANAH DALAM PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 9:426–34. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i03.p05.
Masri, Esther, and Sri Wahyuni. 2021. “Implementasi Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebelum, Saat Dan Sesudah Perkawinan.” Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah 21 (1): 111–20. https://doi.org/10.31599/jki.v21i1.310.
Pawitasari, Aldilla Gemiyu. 2019. “Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Perkawinan Poligami Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol4.iss2.art8.
Pramasantya, Oken Shahnaz. 2017. “PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 69/PUU-XIII/2015.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v8i2.1671.
Raja Hamnan, Nauval, Akhmad Budi Cahyono, and Corresponding Author. 2024. “Pencatatan Perjanjian Perkawinan Dalam Perkawinan Campuran Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Perlukah Pengesahan Dari Pengadilan?” Unes Law Riview 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.
Rohman, Moh. Faizur. 2017. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU/XIII/2015 Tentang Perjanjian Perkawinan Terhadap Tujuan Perkawinan.” Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam 7 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2017.7.1.1-27.
Sukardi. 2016. “Kajian Yuridis Perjanjian Perkawinan Menurut Kitab UndangUndang Hukum Perdata, UndangUndang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Khatulistiwa 6 (1): 19–45.
Syarifah Syawallentin Permatasari. 2020. “Pembatalan Perjanjian Perkawinan Karena Adanya Cacat Kehendak Oleh Salah Satu Pihak.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 1 (1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ayang Afira Anugerahayu, Lalu Panca Tresna D.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.